Sunday, April 7, 2013

Manufacturers and educators are learning a painful lesson.

This week I participated in a “strategic planning retreat” held by a community college in the Chicago area. Regional business leaders, state and federal professionals were gathered to discuss a monumental problem, which I would describe as the relevance of our educational system to industrial manufacturers and to American enterprise at large.

As those of us gathered for the retreat soon learned, college readiness scores and completion rates are at all time lows. We are living in an age when skilled manufacturing jobs and better jobs in general are going unfilled by the tens of thousands. A generation ago, nearly 75% of employed Americans secured good jobs by having a high school diploma or less. But as of 2007, 59% of employed Americans needed more education than this and the number is projected to reach 65% by 2018. *

Traditionally, community colleges in our country have served as bridges, either to four-year colleges or to skilled employment directly. But today these institutions now find themselves under-performing. And why? Because America’s entire education system is under-performing. As the consortium’s organizers began to outline, the problem of gross educational underachievement can be attacked from several angles, including the legislation of seemingly basic expectations such as are mandated by the new “common core curriculum” requirement, which brings reading and writing back into the educational process.

Mandating literacy is a start, but there’s another approach that can help connect the dots a lot faster, and that’s looking at the problem from an understanding of marketing, branding, and organizational change.

Were we to begin at the beginning, effective marketing (value creation) would compel the education system to think-forward its product (better educated students) at every level, but the system fails on this fundamental first step. During the consortium, we learned that secondary education is focused on adapting to the product (failing students) coming out of elementary education; that post-secondary education is focused on the product (increasingly failing students) coming out of secondary education; and so employers are being asked to take in and train people who are not equipped in the most fundamental of ways: The majority of today’s applicants can’t communicate, collaborate or problem-solve; and they can’t learn on the job, because they did not learn in school the things that are essential to further learning on the job.

The startling revelation here is that America’s education system is lousy at marketing. If you are a manufacturer trying to grow in the real world without ongoing, market-based value creation (as many, smaller, second generation industrial manufacturers are still learning), you will sooner or later become irrelevant to the marketplace and go out of business. This however, has not been the course of a system propped up by tax dollars and a culture of dis-ownership.

Having failed at marketing, the American educational system has consequently failed at branding (value definition). When you look at most any community college or 4-year college admissions brochure from the perspective of an employer, what you see is not value definition, not a path to employability, but a line card of courses leading to course certification and ultimately a degree. Hence, what the system values and measures is not the ability of the student graduate to become highly employable, but the student graduate’s ability to achieve passing scores to get a degree.

Which leads us to the process of organizational change, change that can only come about when educational leaders recognize the roles marketing and branding must play to bring about specific changes at every level, changes that must focus on making each level relevant to the next.

The challenge looms large, both for the American education system and for the industrial manufacturing sectors the education system is supposed to support. We are talking about the need for seismic new changes that will be painfully challenging to institutions that are accustomed to doing what they have always done, because for them effective marketing, branding and organizational change all require a reverse new way of thinking: Forward-thinking.

* Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2010). Help wanted: Projections of jobs and education requirements.  Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce.

jb
www.centrifuge-now.com